Alt NIH Bluesky 🧪

@altnih4science.bsky.social

52528 Followers 518 Following

Facts & strategy, in an authoritarian takeover. Rightwing billionaires want to privatize NIH and use it to control universities. We work to cure diseases like cancer. Pers views. #science #medicine

apoirolyb.bsky.social @apoirolyb.bsky.social Right now, the Universities are controlled by the Left, which is as bad as the Extreme Right!! 2:54 PM • Mar 26, 2026
Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D., Director of the Division of AIDS National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (.gov) https://www.niaid.nih.gov › about › carl-w-dieffenbach-... Nov 15, 2018 — Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D., serves as Director of the Division of AIDS (DAIDS). Dr. Dieffenbach oversees a global HIV/AIDS research portfolio of more than $1 ...
Lyin’ Jay Bhattacharya standing next to a child sex trafficker
11:15 - 11:45 AM - TRANSFORMATION AT NIH (Fireside Chat) • Jay Bhattacharya, Director of the National Institutes of Health c • Nicole Kleinstreuer, Deputy Director, NIH DPCPSI • Moderated by Calley Means, Former SGE at U.S. HHS 11:45 - 12:15 PM - MAKING AMERICAN BIOTECHNOLOGY ACC (Panel Discussion) • Alexis Borisy, Co-founder & Operating Chairman, Curie.Bio
Theresa Kim
An anti-Kennedy cabal is trying to remove RFK Jr. from office. They can't debate him - so they're trying to erase him. MAHA ICTION
This new miBrain model from MIT has it all: Neurons, microglia, oligodendroglia, astrocytes, pericytes, & brain microvascular endothelial cells 3O: Key features & functions of the human brain Specificity to individual donors Customizability via gene editing 1 Scalability for large projects Pericytes Astrocytes Endothelial Cells Neurons Oligodendroglia Microglia ALT
Dynlacht Lab ‪@dynlachtlab.bsky.social‬ Follow back We are moderate Democrats. But, be honest here, the left wing of the Democratic party has no viewpoint diversity either. They tried to shove WOKE down the throat of Democrats, it didnt work. It is their way or the high way. And that is WHY we are in this mess. October 19, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Brownstone Institute @brownstoneinst.bsky.social Follow While Gorski and Yamey provided no evidence that Koch money funded the GBD signatories, the BMJ still published their piece....The BMJ article is full of errors that ought to have never found their way into any publication," wrote Martin Kulldorff in the Spectator. brownstone.org/articles/cov.. Covid Bias at the BMJ • Brownstone Institute This week, loannidis and his colleagues published a paper on Covid-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ, ... @ brownstone.org October 19, 2025 at 10:54 AM @ Everybody can reply
curious1973.bsky.social @curious1 • 12m Why the hyperbole? Despite Trump's hostility, the US has a vibrant free press and citizens a constitutional right to speak their minds. Russia? Not so much 门 • • •
NIH nihgov • • The Trump Administration is working to reopen the government for the American people. Mission-critical activities of HHS will continue during the Democrat- led government shutdown. HHS
Look, this guy is a lightweight, at best. Any of the brilliant, productive, long time physician researchers in NIH intramural would share this with you if they could do so safely and without attribution. He is not going to grow into this position. He has peaked in his growth cycle and in this career with this Presidential appointment. To say he is in over his head is obvious. He will avoid situations where he cannot control the players at the table, cause he would have never been invited to sit at the table before given this position. Likely he would not even have been allowed to sit at the circle around the table, as that was always for senior staff. (Anyone familiar with IC directors meetings or SD (scientific directors) meetings will know what this means.
David westwater @lableakboston.bsky.social Follow He is a very dangerous man and gain of function killed twenty million people. We have to stop all biowarfare research
these last two weeks since their hysterical and dangerous response to the tragic killing of Charlie Kirk, Trump has seen the worst polling of his 2nd term. Here's some of what we've seen in recent days. The country has rejected his latest unhinged, illiberal escalation: • 39%-60% (-21) AP-NORC • 38%-59% (-21) ARG • 41%-58% (-17) Reuters/Ipsos • 39%-56% (-17) Economist/YouGov • 40%-56% (-16) Gallup • 43%-56% (-13) WaPo/Ipsos • 42%-55% (-13) GE Morris/Verasign He is also underwater on every major issue right now, suggesting that he will struggle to win this big budget debate with us in the coming months as a majority of the country appears to be unavailable to him now:
From 2003 to 2018, EPPC published The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology and Society. 13] In January 2018, The New Atlantis became independent of EPPC and is now published by the Center for the Study of Technology and Society. [14] EPPC is a member of the advisory board of Project 2025.[15][16
Judicial involvement and public comments On May 1, 2025, Ryan T. Anderson was appointed to President Donald Trump's Religious Liberty Commission. 231[24] EPPC staff submitted public comments supporting the Department of Health and Human Services' proposal to exclude gender-transition procedures from essential health benefits and encouraged the FDA to incorporate biological sex differences into its regulatory guidance. (251 EPPC also urged the Drug Enforcement Administration to preserve state authority over the telemedical prescription of abortion drugs and cross-sex hormones. 261 Additional comments addressed the Department of Veterans Affairs' rule mandating abortion- related benefits, which EPPC opposed, and supported revisions to the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Ari Schulman Mr. Schulman is the editor of The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society. He has written extensively about science
us. "151 Writing in National Review, the journal's editor Adam Keiper described The New Atlantis as being written from a "particularly American and conservative way of thinking about both the blessings and the burdens of modern science and technology". 61 New Atlantis authors and bioethicists publishing in other journals have also similarly referred to The New Atlantis as being written from a social conservative stance that utilizes religion. 71181[9][101
Covidisntreal19 @covidisntreal19.bsky.social 169 followers 96 following 1.1K posts Formerly Covidisntreal19 of Truth Social... I was banned for wrong think about jews Let's see how the free speech is here. Here to debate: virology, politics, messiah trump, Christianity and more. • Account Muted Posts Replies Media Videos 4 Pinned Covidisntreal19 @covidisntreal19.b... • 23d Watch and share 00:00:00 01 - The Tragic Pseudoscience of SARS-
At The Federalist, A Laser Focus on 'Owning the Libs' - The New York Times Aug 3, 2020 • But according to two people with knowledge of its finances, one of its major backers is Dick Uihlein, the Midwestern packing supply magnate and Trump donor who has a history of giving to...
One hallmark of IAF-connected organizations is that they often promote the same allegations and storylines. This is no accident: At the award ceremony last December, Myers provided a glimpse into how IAF works, explaining that each morning, the team gathers on a call to choose the stories they believe the mainstream media is ignoring. After hanging up, “we amplify each other,” she said, “and get it to the hands of the American people.” Star News outlets regularly repackage Just the News articles. Just the News writes stories based on Off the Press coverage and vice versa. They do not disclose their financial links. For example, Just the News covered the 2021 launch of Off the Press without noting that either organization was funded by IAF.
ay Bhattacharya's got a banned words list at NIH. And he's falsely blaming NIH program officers for it. National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya, meanwhile, is fending off a mutiny by nearly 500 self-identified staff — some perhaps laid off in reduction-in-force plans — based in part on an alleged "list of banned words" in grants recommended for funding, especially those related to diversity, equity and inclusion. "This one is really frustrating," Bhattacharya [said]. He informed representatives of the "Bethesda Declaration," named after NIH's Maryland home base, at their July 21 meeting that "I ordered there be no banned list" to his staff months ago, but some program officers "took it upon themselves" to create ad hoc, unofficial lists. Ed: in fact, HHS and DOGE, above Bhattacharya's head, have been terminating grants for 'banned words.' Program officers have been helping scientists to avoid those cancellations by noting which words they have seen the Trump HHS terminating grants for. If there indeed was an actual order, Bhattacharya hasn't been able to make it stick. (link to article, archive link to avoid direct link) It's funny to see this, which shows at bottom that the Trump NIH director, Bhattacharya, has no power. He may have "ordered" there be no banned word list, but the grant rejections due to banned words and content are coming from HHS. Above his head. Bhattacharya is a puppet who has little or no power. Russell Vought and RFK Jr are running the show at NIH. What is he doing if he has no influence? Bhattacharya appears to be filling his spare time with rightwing, or gateway-to-the-right, podcasts and conservative media hits: Fox, Bari Weiss, Hoover Institution, Reason, Huberman, Bill Ackman, and now this interview*. Meanwhile, Bhattacharya is giving "orders" and his bosses Vought and RFK are ignoring his "orders." And now that grants are continuing to be terminated and rejected for banned context, he has to blame someone. So he…
The whistle-blower complaints said Dr. Matthew J. Memoli, the National Institutes of Health’s principal deputy director, repeatedly downplayed the value of vaccines in meetings. Credit...National Institutes of Health Dr. Marrazzo and Dr. Neuzil say in the complaints that Dr. Memoli repeatedly downplayed the value of vaccines in situations that included discussions of the latest flu season’s heavy death toll among children. At the same time, the scientists said, the N.I.H. was canceling vaccine studies at universities across the country. The agency then added layers of political review to the grant-making process that would rule out any research at odds with Mr. Kennedy’s “scientifically unsupported position that vaccines caused harm, including autism in children,” the complaints say. Editors’ Picks A Family of 7 Looked for a Wreck to Restore in Pennsylvania Dutch Country You Don’t Need to Be Good at Math to Enjoy It How Lin-Manuel Miranda Weathered the Storm Even as it cut some vaccine research, the complaints said, the health department awarded $500 million in May to a universal vaccine project that many scientists said relied on badly outdated technology. Dr. Memoli, a flu expert who had previously worked on the project, was one of the award’s chief recipients. Dr. Marrazzo and Dr. Neuzil say in their complaints that the award did not pass “any of N.I.H.’s usual rigorous and competitive scientific review processes.” They add that “directing so much money to one research project in the absence of peer review can be viewed as gross mismanagement and a gross waste of funds.” Mr. Nixon said in the statement that “any suggestion that Dr. Memoli supports vaccines only when they serve his personal research interests is entirely false and misleading.” He added, “Science is not one-size-fits-all. Covid-19 does not behave the same as influenza, and it is inaccurate to conflate the two or to suggest their vaccines should be approached identically.” Are you a federal worker? …
Bhattacharya, MD, PhD @NIHDirector_Jay At least two of the authors of this piece were in charge of the @CDCgov during the era when it embraced politicized school closures and covid vaccine mandates. For them to criticize Sec. @RobertKennedyJr for his efforts to restore gold standard science to the CDC harms public health. The New Work Times GULSE ESSAY We Ran the C.D.C.: Kennedy Is Endangering Every American's Health
Prisonculture ‪@prisonculture.bsky.social‬ yup. Years ago a mentor of mine said to me: "always choose to take action over thinking about taking action even though you will often fail." I was in my 20s and it really stuck with me. I am grateful for the teachers I have had.
Mr. Trump "is a threat to bureaucracy, not democracy," said Paul Dans, the architect of Project 2025, the right-wing blueprint for Mr. Trump's presidency. "He has an extremely high regard for science."
change.org My petitions Membership Q, Search Start a petition Log in Remove Jeffery Taubenberger as Acting Director of NIAID 51° Verified signatures V * Let's get to 100 signatures? Petitions with 1,000 + supporters are Sx more likely to win! Sign this petition First name VIROL Last name Recent signers: Jeff Black - 5 hours ago Email Tamara harrison • 5 hours ago Patrick McCaffrey • 6 hours ago Elizabeth
Confirmed Speakers Dir. Tulsi Gabbard Featured Speaker Dir. Kelly Loeffler Featured Speaker Dir. Russell Vought Featured Speaker Nigel Farage MP Featured Speaker Dir. Jay Bhattacharya Featured Speaker Sen. Jim Banks Featured Speaker Harmeet Dhillon Featured Speaker Amb. Jamieson Greer Featured Speaker Sen. Josh Hawley Featured Speaker Tom Homan Featured Speaker Sen. Eric Schmitt Featured Speaker Christopher DeMuth Beaconsfield Prize Honoree Larry Arnn Featured Speaker Steve Bannon Featured Speaker Mike Benz Featured Speaker Rachel Bovard Featured Speaker Mike Davis Featured Speaker Patrick Deneen Featured Speaker Yoram Hazony Featured Speaker Tom Klingenstein Featured Speaker Albert Mohler Featured Speaker Rep. Riley Moore Featured Speaker Jack Posobiec Featured Speaker Kevin Roberts Featured Speaker
The recent shooting at CDC is not why I am resigning. My grandfather, who I am named after, stood up to fascist forces in Greece and lost his life doing so. I am resigning to make him and his legacy proud. I am resigning because of the cowardice of a leader that cannot admit that HIS and his minions' words over decades created an environment where violence like this can occur. I reject his and his colleagues' thoughts and prayers, and advise they direct those to people that they have not actively harmed.
light by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I find that the views he and his staff have shared challenge my ability to continue in my current role at the agency and in the service of the health of the American people. Enough is enough. While I hold immense respect for the institution and my colleagues, I believe that it is imperative to align my professional responsibilities to my system of ethics and my understanding of the science of infectious disease, immunology, and my promise to serve the American people. This step is necessary to ensure that I can contribute effectively in a capacity that allows me to remain true to my principles. I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public's health. The recent change in the adult and children's immunization schedule threaten the lives of the
Neal Parikh @npparikh • 2h This is a running joke in "Convex Optimization" (the lectures, not the book) by Stephen Boyd, always told with real affection and amusement. "This is from the 1950s. Or, well, in Russia, the 1930s." Valeriy M., PhD, ... @predi... • Aug 23 Forget Silicon Valley. The true blueprint for modern online learning wasn't written in code, but in ink and paper, and it was postmarked from the Soviet Union. ЗФТІІ ло математике 1. КОТЕЛОВЕЕ КЛЕПО 2）4=6-2-11 3) 6 = 2 - 1÷6, (a+ (a+0; 1: 5) 5 - 5- 1-1 - 5. 92=6-3=2， DS- 1 - 7 = 9.+ 2 - 8, B+g42re4
“We have this feeling of extreme uncertainty, in a context where, previously, we could depend upon a robust system, a merit-based system that was predictable for the right reasons — the best science will get funded,” said Ambros, who shared the Nobel in medicine last year. Jesse Lehman, a graduate student who focuses on understanding the speed and dynamics of immune defenses against pathogens, became hooked on science when he first felt the rush of discovering things no one else knew. There are no guarantees in this career — the contest for federal funding is exceptionally competitive. But what has fueled the system is its reliability. The federal government funds the best research, year after year, and scientists chase grants without worrying that the funder may lose interest in neuroscience or immunology and decide instead to buy a sports team. But now, federal funding may be there one moment and gone the next. “I have this fear that the career that I’ve worked 10 years on developing
"support Rep. Gaetz's work with WCW"
tweet from Heritage
David Gortler is a staffer at the Heritage Foundation
White Coat Waste Project https://www.whitecoatwaste.org › lyndsey-fifield-adviso... Lyndsey is the Social Media Manager at the Heritage Foundation. White Coat Waste Project · Donate. PO. Box 26029, Washington, DC 20001.
Kevin C. Klatt, PhD, RD v @KCKlatt Follow Why is our official HHS account splitting hairs and relying on handwavy mechanism of action-based rational to give nutrition advice?
University of Vienna Genuinely curious. Since 1365.
pheeeeeeew
Bert Gold, PhD @bgphd.bsky.social Follow Back Earth to reality: There were so many official lies during COVID (redactions of emails, manuscripts in which all authors agreed to tell palatable stories, many others), that the public has no idea who to trust. Am I the only one who understands this??? August 9, 2025 at 10:09 PM
u/TourMission • 5 hr. ago Trump Administration Illegally Withheld N.I.H. Funding, Watchdog Finds https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/us/politics/trump-gao-nih-funding.html?unlocked_article_code=1.cE8.Zb_0.MHKSmHO7r_HI&smid=url-share Upvote 159 Downvote 5 Go to comments Share u/afpiofra avatar u/afpiofra • Promoted Join the America First movement as Software Engineer. Build tools that make good policies for America! Apply here: Join the America First movement as Software Engineer. Build tools that make good policies for America! Apply here: americafirstpolicy.com Apply Now UpvoteVote Downvote 27 Go to comments Share
The math world was taken aback when Cairo announced her counterexample to the Mizohata-Takeuchi conjecture — both because it settled a major open problem, and because Cairo was still in high school at the time. Valerie Plesch for Quanta Magazine Cairo followed this advice. In the fall of 2023, her family moved to Davis, 60 miles northeast of Berkeley. There, her older brother enrolled as a freshman at UC Davis, and her parents allowed her to commute to Berkeley on Tuesdays and Thursdays. By the spring, she was going five days a week and taking several more classes. She recalls it as a time in her life when she began to feel full of possibility. “I had started making friends, and I was feeling good,” she said. After the spring semester ended, her family moved from Davis to Berkeley — her brother had decided to transfer there — and Cairo finally felt able to settle in. Even so, it was an adjustment. “I didn’t have many social experiences, so I still had to learn how to interact with other humans,” she said. As the 2024–2025 academic year neared, Cairo considered what courses she would take. One class in particular caught her eye — a graduate course in Fourier restriction theory, a branch of harmonic analysis. “It was one of the most advanced analysis classes being offered that semester, so I thought, I’ll just go take it,” she said. Portrait of Ruixiang Zhang. The mathematician Ruixiang Zhang gave Cairo a homework problem that she couldn’t stop thinking about. He later became her adviser. Lin Lin The professor for the course was Ruixiang Zhang(opens a new tab), an accomplished mathematician whose path into the fiel
Last week, the Republican leadership kept the Senate in session, trying to force weary Democrats to agree to a nomination deal as a condition for going home for August. Democrats have forced Republicans to eat up floor time on low-level appointees. When Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) wanted to bundle up a bunch of nominees for confirmation, Democrats said sure—as long as President Trump stopped denying funding already appropriated by Congress (in particular, for the National Institutes of Health and some foreign aid) and refrained from another rescission package to nullify previously approved spending. In other words, Democrats were using their ability to grind floor time to get concessions that shouldn’t even be seen as concessions (they amount to “stop breaking the law” and “don’t supersede deals already agreed to”). Trump said no to this mild imposition on his power, and the deal blew up. So the Senate wrapped up nominations already in motion and left on Saturday.
Don Moynihan 1d Can We Still Govern? DOGErs who applied to the US Digital Service did not get hired. Under Musk, they were not only hired, but given carte blanche to break the law. In other words, experience provides humility. Farritor had neither. Experience is especially important in a public settings, since the inevitable arc of technologists in government goes in one of two directions. They start by assuming they know better than the people who are familiar with the statutes and programs they are asked to implement, and treat them condescendingly. Then, they either learn that they are wrong, or they don’t. The ones who learn can become truly useful government officials. Those that don’t end up growing frustrated and leaving, or if given sufficient power, destroy what they don’t understand. Farritor, the brilliant and curious young man, is in the latter category.
They watched with interest as he blamed their hardships on Jews and on other nations. But most of them thought he would stop short of a war. After all, Hitler had managed to take power in Germany without a war. These quotes from Wigner, Peierls, and Frisch are some things we all have heard from scientists today. Albert Einstein, writing in his diary, December 1931: I decided today that I shall essentially give up my Berlin position and shall be a bird of passage for the rest of my life. Who amongst us will make this decision? Will it be made for us?
air quality does matter
Rachel Cauley headshot Rachel Cauley Office of Management and Budget (Jan. 2025-), Communications Director vCard PowerBrief
Gordon Strause Gordon Strause 1d I get why this is disruptive for scientists this year. But next year, since the labs that got a multi-year grant the previous year presumably won't be applying, it should be easier for labs that didn't get funding that year to get funding since they won't have to compete with these labs. And so and son on for a couple more years. So while the change will cause some short term disruption, in time (unless the budget is cut), presumably just as many scientists get funded. Is that wrong? If so, what am I missing here?
@firedbutfighting EDUCATION? Education UF University of Florida Master of Arts - MA, Mass Communication, Public Relati May 2021 - Aug 2022 UF University of Florida Graduate Certificate, Global Strategic Communication May 2021 - Aug 2022 Liberty University Bachelor's degree, Law and Policy 2017 - 2020 Brunswick Community College WHENSWICK Associate's Degree 2014 - 2017 Brunswick Early College High School High School 2012 - 2017 Liberty University (yikes) Finished High School in 2017 (double yikes he's 27)
Who is in charge of communications at HHS? Andrew Nixon @firedbutfighting
Alliance Defending Freedom ADF is a hate group that uses litigation and advocacy to roll back rights for Americans everywhere, specifically focusing on… Learn more Teneo Network The Teneo Network serves as “a pipeline” that seeks to place conservatives in “positions of influence in key industries in… Learn more Moms for Liberty Moms for Liberty attacks public schools in order to advocate for policies that would privatize education, a goal of the… Learn more America First Legal America First Legal is a conservative group founded by Trump admin officials to challenge the Biden administration. Learn more Center For Renewing America The Center for Renewing America is a right-wing think tank founded as a project of the Conservative Partnership Institute. Learn more Honest Elections Project Honest Elections Project and HEP Action have run disinformation campaigns against mail-in voting, trained state officials in voter suppression efforts,… Learn more Heritage Foundation The Heritage Foundation is an influential conservative think tank that spreads voter and election fraud disinformation. Heritage has been active… Learn more Public Interest Legal Foundation The Public Interest Legal Foundation spreads disinformation about voter and election fraud and engages in voter suppression efforts. Learn more American Accountability Foundation The American Accountability Foundation Is A Trumpworld Opposition Research Outfit That Has Worked To Undermine Biden’s Nominees Who Are Women… Learn more Conservative Partnership Institute The Conservative Partnership Institute Is A Key Nexus Of Trumpworld’s Efforts To Roll Back Voting Rights And Push Dangerous Election… Learn more
you are a lab head, this affects you; if you are a student, this threatens your future The NIH grant system was already hyper- competitive before Trump. This policy will make it brutal. Without immediate resistance from the research community, this policy will go forward with devastating consequences for US science. What can you do? • Contact your Congressional representatives. It is best to show up in person. Explain and tell them to oppose this forward funding mandate. Share this article if it helps! Tell them to protect NIH funding. • For researchers: Make noise within your institution. Ask your research office what they re doing to push back. Talk to your program officers. Demand transparency. • Tell your local press that Trump is destroying US medical research, and find local activist groups to reach out to. • There are many engaged citizens across the country affected by cancer, or Alzheimer's, that want more information from scientists to help them advocate to their elected officials and to the press. Offer to talk to them, and help them do
Vance, Rufo, Trump and Republican elites are now acting out this agenda: attacking NIH and manipulating its grants to attack American universities. American universities are a shining star of America’s economic power, a magnet for talent that attracts people from all over the world. So why do movement conservatives want to destroy universities? It’s an important question right now, one that many scientists are just waking up to. The answer is that conservatives hate universities because they are bastions of free thought, which leads them to self-organize into liberal places. Smart people, whether they are center-right, center-left, or left, generally support core liberal values of intellectual freedom, fairness, and the rule of law. That leads people in academia, including scientists, to oppose today’ authoritarian conservatism — today’s autocratic and oligarchic US Republican party. Universities also occupy a privileged place in public debate. Scholars at universities get quoted in the press; scientists at universities weigh in on the truth and validity of oil CEOs’ climate claims, and on COVID deniers’ public health claims. In other words, universities are independent arbiters of truth in a free society. They are institutions that can push back on autocrats. That’s a major reason Rufo and Vance hate universities so much: universities limit the power of autocrats. So Trump and Republican elites are now seeking to politicize, damage, and corrupt NIH — they want to take over the science grantmaking system to destroy US universities.
NIH NIH V @NIH Follow ... In accordance with Executive Order 14292, the Office of the Director asked NIAID to identify projects that could potentially fall under the definition of dangerous gain of function (dGOF) research. The NIAID staff identified those projects, but then inappropriately made an assessment to determine which were or were not dGOF research and reduced this list. Principal Deputy Director Dr. Matthew Memoli corrected NIAID staff to assure that NIH was in compliance with the EO by ordering them to submit the full list for temporary pause. Per the EO a final determination on these projects will be made according to the OSTP designated oversight policy. 3:22 PM • Jul 17, 2025 • 80.4K Views
Colbert shrugging We are officially at the "pulling comedians off the air who criticize our dear leader" phase of fascism.
Vought's comments set off Hill furor as shutdown threat looms
Acknowledgements We thank all the families in SPARK, the SPARK clinical sites and SPARK staff. We acknowledge access to the SPARK phenotypic and genetic datasets on SFARI Base. Approved researchers can obtain the SPARK population dataset described in this study by applying at https://base.sfari.org. This work used computing resources supported by the Scientific Computing Core at the Flatiron Institute and was supported by funding from the NIH NIGMS no. R01GM071966 (O.G.T.), Simons Foundation grant 395506 (O.G.T.) and NIH NHGRI training grant T32HG003284 (A.L.).
Trish Schnabel, a licensed professional counselor according to an online profile, who sometimes uses her maiden name, Duffy, was only one of the people named on the contract, and she would not have received the full amount, according to officials. According to a federal website, NIH awarded a sole-source contract. The contract supports “project coordination and subject matter expert support” for a broad swath of administration priorities, including autism, counterintelligence and high level strategic research security. An internal spreadsheet obtained by the Post showed that Trish Schnabel was being onboarded as a “senior analyst” in the Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives.