Bad Copyright Takes

@badcopyright.bsky.social

1083 Followers 20 Following

Immortalizing the worst copyright takes for life + 70 years. DM or @ for submissions.

From Matthew Keys @matthewkeys.net "Just saw this. Now I understand why you're a miserable person. You don't have to impart it on everyone else." Showing a screenshot of the bio of Andrew Davis @thrownintosol.bsky.social, with full bio reading: "Tired and barely functional. Long Covid. Autistic, ADHD, OCD, Chronic Depression. Profile Pic; @failnaut on Twitter/Bluesky!" "Chronic Depression" is highlighted.
Tweet 1: You do realize that all the authors were paid, right? Like, when I was EiC they were all paid and given summaries of their sales. You also realize that all the authors had their rights given back to them since like July 1st, yeah? Tweet 2: You do realize that the books aren't being sold by DLP either, right? Like, we have them taken down and have, again, since early July. But here's KDP's TOS in case you're struggling with this.
Zannon Koitsu @Sotamusora First, its not stealing if you bought the game. Which its still a demo. An second, boof vr is not copyright protected since, it doesnt have a patent prior to 9/20/2020 let alone when the demo v1 was released . How about people prove its copyright protected first .
Zannon Koitsu @Sotamusora Enjoy the free ports of the #boofvr models [redacted mediafire link]. Cause, you should never pay for a demo of a game . Like #werethrope would force people to think . He should just stop and work for #electronicart where his greed would be welcomed. [Image of three nude furry bara men with a Sencorship bar over their lower halves]
Ryolator @Fryolator1 Another "fun fact" - these companies all hosted copyrighted material for years, which is why they needed Section 230. So now that they are editing content, do I have a case against them when they publish material I find inappropriate, libelous, or that I have rights to?
Bad Vibes @badvibes258 No because she is focused on 1/20th of the issue. Second, when she used the art to promote her brand, that alone changes the analysis from copyright analysis to trademark. Which changes the qualiy and due diligence of her analysis.
From Bad Vibes @badvibes replying to Kathryn Towson Well did you have permission to post your content? Is that little fat bird yours? Can you prove it? Then the second question is to file a dmca claim did you do a fair use analysis first? Those steps have to be followed. And remember copyright doesn't cover certain things. Kathryn Tewson @KathrynTewson replying to Bad Vibes Yeah, I did. That bird is mine; it's my own original design, I painted it myself, and I took the photo that forms the basis of the digital work myself. Here is a picture of the signed original on my wall. [Signed picture of an orange watercolor bird hanged on a wall] Bad Vibes @badvibes258 replying to Kathryn Tewson See you have a tiny little problem. A bird doesn't necessarily get the benefit of copywrite protection.
Deleted post
From: Paul @Paul91458279 “Original work is copyrightable. Such as my ideas. Using such without my expressed written permission is illegal and liable for prosecution. I have never signed away my copyright rights in my life. So…… @BenPBradshaw @RDEhospitals @nhscreative @NHS @NHSEnglandLDN @NHSConfed Screen capture of a Google search of “what is classified as. original literary”
From: vic mignogna @vicmignogna "Many have asked over the years if I would ever have a pop figure made of me. Well, no one wants one of ME, but what about one that represents ten different characters I've played over the years? Here's the prototype! It's all ready to go, so if you like it please let Funko know!"
From: Reborn Exists @jordanreapers Congrats to Emmett The Perjure Plant and Kathryn Two-Ton-Sam for getting my Youtube channel taken down by false flagging it, which by the way is in complete violation of the Freedom of speech Act or commonly known as the 1st Amendment. #ISWV #IStandWithVic
From: TheBigPaunch @TheBigPaunch replying to Kathryn Tewson “You admitted that it was a false claim earlier saying that Twitter laws and Youtube laws don’t apply to your claim. That’s a not-so-subtle admission to guilt right there”
From Reborn Exists @jordanreapers on Twitter, replying to Kathryn Tewson: "No one. The moment you create a account on twitter your copy right protection is invalid because Twitter is a public domain. Pure and simple and it's in the license agreement we all automatically agree too so there's no way around it and further more youtube has a fair use."