Ben Morris @benmorris.com · Feb 23 So #ufosky what is the consensus on this book? I know it has some controversy, I'm half way through it and surprised how detailed it is. I was also surprised to read the forward was written by Strom Thurmond himself.
12 likes 8 replies
Replies
I think the Book was highly edited and embellished. However there was much that was factual. I listened to interview of him when he was quite elderly and he was adamant about many facts. This is a good article including his son who discusses his prior manuscript: openminds.tv/corso-legacy/
I’ve been wondering the same. I listened to it last year and thought it was crazy interesting. Hard to tell how much is 4 real.
UAP Gerb has made an excellent video about Philip J. Corso and his report. #ufosky youtu.be/_sv0Otxtcn4
His original manuscript,– untouched by Birnes – is available here: archive.org/details/Phil...
Corso prone to exaggerating it's been said
I find it very hard to believe a two person team at the Pentagon were responsible for so many tech advancements. "We had a bunch of material in a filing cabinet and I gave it to tech companies and now we have fiber optics, microprocessors, missile tech, etc. it was all me, I did it" Nah
The family says that much of the book is out of order (wrong timeline) and that some events did happen, others didn’t. The interviews on YouTube with Corso are a good first hand source. I’d say the gist of the book is probably true with fine details being a bit off. Did NHI crash at Roswell? Yes.
@patternstellstories.com had some great details on Corso’s connections to shady shit in their latest episode. UFO books by intel people are exactly what you’d expect them to be.