B

Bob511

@bob511.bsky.social

90 Followers 87 Following

Alleged Hearsay FL

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70993525/109/1/african-communities-together-v-lyons/ 7. In recent months, ERO has experienced substantial difficulty when conducting enforcement actions in public due to disruptive agitators and criminals who impede lawful immigration arrests or otherwise hinder ICE and DHS operations. For example, on July 21, 2026, the Department of Justice charged Andrew Arrabaca with felony arson after he allegedly set fire to the employee entrance of the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building at 26 Federal Plaza.
To the contrary, Defendants have threatened enforcement only when the circumstances surrounding a city's refusal to execute a 287(g) agreement revealed that the municipality inin fact banned or discouraged those agreements or is failing to use best efforts to support the enforcement of federal immigration law. In Fort Myers, for example, the City refused to execute a 287(g) agreement that its local police department strenuously recommended. Id.1 70-72. "By failing to approve the [police department's] 287(g) agreement' despite the department's strong insistence, Fort Myers had evinced an "implicit[] ... sanctuary policy" barring 287(g) agreements. Id. | 75. But that is worlds different from the barebones hypothetical South Miami has proposed, most obviously
Climate change denial: reposting a tweet by Michael Shellenberger: "Some reporters and scientists are blaming climate change for the lack of rain in LA. It's ridiculous. There's no trend in annual rainfall from 1877 to 2024. We have wet years and dry years. Climate change isn't responsible for the LA fires. Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass are."
Tweet of Senator Chris Van Hollen visiting and advocating for the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia after he was illegally sent to a prison in El Salvador, and a reply by @eugenbold: "Can you fight for the American citizens currently held by Hamas as hard as you are fighting for criminal illegal aliens?"
After families shared their stories in the media to expose these conditions, which included direct testimony from the men inside, they say the men who spoke out were targeted for retaliation inside the detention facility. According to family members, correctional officers warned detainees that they could not speak publicly about conditions inside the facility and have since placed several of those men in solitary confinement. One family says their loved one was told he would remain in solitary confinement for 30 days simply for speaking to the press. “Our loved ones are being punished for telling the truth,” said family members coming forward at the event. “No one should face retaliation for exposing inhumane treatment. We are demanding transparency, accountability, and immediate action to protect every person inside this facility.”
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73538413/9/rosales-fulez-v-miami-field-office-director-enforcement-and-removal/ Petitioner takes no issue with the Court’s legal analysis in ordering the Petition transferred to the Western District of Louisiana. Rather, Petitioner insists that the Court’s conclusion that she was no longer in this District at the time the Petition was filed was an “error of apprehension.” (DE [7] p. 2). In support, Petitioner has put forth additional evidence which she suggests confirms her location in this District at the relevant time. Putting aside that the Court’s “apprehension” of the facts was of Petitioner’s own making, the additional evidence fails to set forth facts of a “strongly convincing nature” that Petitioner was not already located in the Western District of Louisiana at the time the Petition was filed.
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a365c9&showTrace=2026-06-26&leg=1 A map of the southeast United States, with a rainbow trace from Opa-locka in southeast Florida to Alexandria in central Louisiana, by flight GXA6181 (tail N318NV) on 2026-06-26, with departure time 12:37:55Z and arrival 14:40:52Z.
4. Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (“OPLA”) Metro Region ERO embedded counsel sends an arrest referral spreadsheet to the SDDO for review daily. ERO utilizes detailees to review the cases referred on the spreadsheet from OPLA to highlight possible individuals for arrest. Detailees review the DHS law enforcement electronic databases, specifically, Enforce Alien Removal Module (“EARM”), to verify if an alien has any prior encounters with ERO, the Criminal Alien Program, or has violated the Alternatives to Detention program. 5. The SDDO then reviews the vetted cases highlighted by detailees for criminal history and cross references criminal electronic databases, including immediately conducting a National Crime Information Center (NCIC) check and obtaining a digital record of arrest and prosecutions (RAP) sheet from the New York Integrated Justice Portal (eJustice). ERO also reviews USCIS databases to determine whether an alien has any pending applications.
Make the Road argues that A.A.R.P. counsels otherwise. Again, we disagree. In A.A.R.P., the detainees were not given constitutionally adequate notice that they were subject to removal under the Alien Enemies Act and lacked “sufficient time and information” to “actually seek habeas relief” before removal. 145 S. Ct. at 1367–68. The Court required notice of the Government’s asserted authority and procedures sufficient to permit detainees to pursue habeas in a meaningful way. Id. at 1368. The Court did not hold that the government must provide the detainees with an objective on-the-one-hand-onthe-other-hand memo about whether Tren de Aragua was an arm of the Maduro regime, walk them through a corpus linguistics of “invasion” as it was understood in 1798, or explain the XYZ Affair and the Quasi-War with France to provide historical context for the Act. The holding was about notice of the action and a realistic opportunity to seek relief — not notice of every conceivable counterargument.
A DHS spokesperson said Tuesday afternoon that it is a precautionary measure amid hurricane season. Agency officials cite the facility’s “soft structure,” which could put detainees at risk should a storm roll through.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · 51m Welcome home to Justo Betancourt, whose Daughter, Arianne, fought very hard to free her father from Alligator Alcatraz. Enjoy your Freedom together!!! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Congressman Jared Moskowitz smiling next to former GEO Group executive VP/prison profiteer, former GOP legislator, and current FAU president Adam Hasner.
Under Mexican law, people who initiated an asylum claim with COMAR are required to stay in the state where they filed the claim while it is pending. In practice, this leaves Cuban deportees trapped without support in cities where organized crime and other security risks are high. Tapachula, in Chiapas near the Guatemalan border, is a known transit hub where migrants are routinely targeted by smuggling networks, extortion rings, and human traffickers; Villahermosa, in Tabasco, has experienced sustained violence linked to disputes between rival cartels and was one of the states with the highest homicide rates in Mexico in recent years. “We are stranded here,” said Camilo, a 51-year-old Cuban man deported to Tapachula after 21 years in the United States. “They left us here like dogs.”
ORDER CHARACTERISTIC of the undersigned’s upbringing, surrounded by law-abiding immigrants who left oppressive conditions in search of a rule-following citizenry in a country that offered a better life, there was one maxim that rang true above all others: one respected and followed his parents even when they were wrong. Today that same principle applies with the concept of vertical precedent. Despite the superior and well-reasoned plain-meaning analysis of the dissenting judge in Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, Federal Detention Center, Miami, 2026 WL 1243395 (11th Cir. May 6, 2026) (Lagoa, J.), this Court is duty-bound to follow the majority opinion authored by its parent court. The Eleventh Circuit ruled that aliens who are detained within the country, rather than upon arrival at the border, are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) but are instead entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226. Because § 1225(b)(2)(A) by its plain language applies to non-admitted aliens who are inspected in the interior, the rule created in Alvarez should not have come
Paolo Zampolli, a former modeling agent turned presidential special envoy, had learned that his Brazilian ex-girlfriend was in a Miami jail, arrested on charges of fraud at her workplace. They had been in a custody battle over their teenage son. Now he saw an opportunity. He reached out to a top official at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, explaining that his ex was in the country illegally, according to records obtained by The New York Times and a person familiar with the communications. Could she be put in ICE detention? That could help him get his son back. The official, David Venturella, promptly called the agency’s Miami office to ensure that ICE agents would pick up the woman from the jail before she was released on bail, according to the records and a person with knowledge of the conversation who requested anonymity to discuss it. During the call, Mr. Venturella noted that the case was important to someone close to the White House. The woman, Amanda Ungaro, was placed in ICE custody and ultimately deported, an outcome that may well have happened regardless of Mr. Zampolli’s meddling. But the ICE official’s willingness to spring into action for a Trump ally — even one in a low-level, largely ceremonial role — reflects a recurring theme of the second Trump administration: The levers of the federal government can be pulled to settle a personal score.
In mid-March, ICE attorneys received an email directing them not to file new motions to pretermit cases, The Seattle Times reported, but that cases where motions had already been filed could continue. DHS did not respond to CBS News' request for comment on the memo.
The only Southern District of Florida judge (at the time of the publication of this list) who had endorsed the Trump administration's ridiculous "mandatory detention for all applicants for admission" policy, Raag Singhal.
Not everyone has made the cut. Joe Bovino, a Florida immigration attorney, advanced far in the Trump administration’s process. He is the author of several books, including one that he advertises as a “field guide” to Latinas in the United States. The book includes sexually explicit descriptions of body types and an image of a zipper to rate women’s “promiscuity.” Bovino was recently assigned to the Miami immigration court, records reviewed by The Post show. But when the Justice Department issued press releases announcing the new judges this month, his name wasn’t on the list. In text messages with The Post, Bovino said he didn’t know why he was pulled. He said that it was “obvious” his books were meant to be humorous and emphasized that they were written “years ago.” “I enjoyed it while it lasted,” he said of the training. “Lots of patriots and good people involved.”
The recruits are being offered signing bonuses, [highlighted in blue]the opportunity to work from home[/highlighting], and even the flexibility to keep their day jobs and moonlight as judges after hours. New hires can earn up to $207,500 a year and 25 percent signing bonuses in some Democrat led-states such as California.
The majority expands the scope of our review of the district court’s injunction under the guise of evaluating the district court’s legal conclusions, but in doing so, does not grapple with the ongo- ing trend in this circuit to “ignor[e] and/or revis[e] the district court’s factual findings and fail[ ] to apply the clear error stand- ard . . . .” Fla. Decides Healthcare, Inc. v. Fla. Sec’y of State, No. 25- 12370, 2025 WL 3738554, at *9 (11th Cir. Sept. 9, 2025) (Abudu, J., dissenting) (quoting Otto v. City of Boca Raton, 41 F.4th 1271, 1285 (11th Cir. 2022) (Jordan, J., dissenting)). We are not supposed to redetermine the facts for ourselves. Today, by vacating the district court’s preliminary injunction, the majority ignores the district court’s careful and extensive fact finding, attributing fault and error where there was none.
Carlos Gimenez whitewashing the deplorable conditions at FDC Miami into a set of local news microphones in front of the jail following his "oversight fact-finding mission" in June 2025.
Florida Soft Sided Facility South Miami Field Office Contacting a Detainee Legal & Case Information Attorney-Client Communication & Visitation Visitation Detainee Property Feedback or Complaints
Available data shows there’s cause for concern, says Ashley Gravlin, a third-year law student at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta who has been tracking habeas corpus petitions. In her research, Gravlin found that since January 2025, there have been at least 68 habeas petitions that involve trafficking survivors in ICE detention.
Here's how you know Home Call 1-866-DHS-2-ICE Report Crime DetainDetention Facilities South Florida Detention Center Miami Field Office Facility Information Attorneys or legal representatives seeking information regarding communication or visitation with aliens detained at the State of Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM) South Florida Detention Facility should contact FDEM representatives at legal@privacy6.com. For additional information, please see the FDEM website. Updated: 04/10/2026 Local Footer Navigation Address 54575 Tamiami Trail East Ochopee, FL 34141 United States See Map
SKATE FOR ALL The skating ray represents the intrinsic link between skateboarding and baseball; a tribute to the hard work and grit it takes to land a stalefish, or square up a 100-mph fastball.
William P. Dimitrouleas, judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida: "Upon careful consideration of the arguments presented by both sides, the Court is persuaded by the reasoning and conclusion of the recent decision entered on February 6, 2026 by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, holding that the noncitizen petitioners in removal proceedings were subject to mandatory detention under 28 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) because they were present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, despite having entered illegally many years ago. See Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi et al., Case. Nos. 25-20496; 25-40701 (Feb. 6, 2026). The Court adopts the analysis of the majority opinion of that decision as if set forth herein. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [DE 1] is DENIED;"
One last thing. As noted, Florida submitted its grant application to the federal government on August 7, 2025, weeks before the district court issued the preliminary injunction. Yet neither the state defendants nor the federal defendants, nor their counsel, notified the district court—which was acting as fact-finder—of Florida’s pending application. They also did not notify us—the stay panel—of that application while their motion to stay was under consideration. As part of its rationale for granting a stay, the majority de-clared that DHS had “not received, processed, or approved any appli- cations for funding[.]” Maj. Initial Order at 18 (emphasis added). When our panel issued the stay order, none of the defendants or their counsel sought to correct the majority’s misconception that Florida had not yet applied for the federal grant. This failure was significant because, as noted, Florida was the only eligible applicant for the grant. Once Florida submitted its application, federal ap- proval was—as former DHS Secretary Noem and Governor De- Santis had proclaimed—essentially a fait accompli.
For the LEA: Date: 4/28/2025 Signature: Signed by: George R. Keller, Jr. CPPT co JD BB25DD053647405... Name: George R. Keller, Jr., CPPT Title: City Manager Agency: Hollywood Police Department, FL Approved as to Form: -DocuSigned by: Damaris Henlon DS DS -DS VM Damariss Henlon, Interim City Attorney
iv. State Defendants and Federal Defendants shall, pending further Order of this Court, maintain publicly available information regarding protocols for attorneyclient communication via ICE and FDEM websites.
The Court will hold Defendants accountable for Saunders’ and Lumm’s representations. Additionally, the Court will require Defendants to document the unscheduled legal visits policy in writing; publish it on their relevant websites for the public, attorneys, and detainees; and keep the published policies current. See infra, Part IV.C.3. This directive will ensure that detainees and attorneys know that they will continue to have unscheduled legal visits from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sundays.
Warden Mordant wants no part of this case. He has moved to dismiss the petition, arguing he is an improper respondent. (Doc. 9.) Mordant’s logic is highly practical: while he manages the physical facility, he does so under a contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). In his view, ICE calls all the shots—ICE selects the detainees, ICE transports them, and ICE alone holds the legal authority to authorize their release. Because he is merely carrying out federal directives, Mordant insists he is just a functionary and the true custodian is ICE. (Id. at 5-10.) The Federal Respondents oppose the motion. (Doc. 15.) They readily concede that they are the ones litigating the merits of these cases and coordinating with ICE. But as a matter of pure law, they maintain Mordant is a necessary and proper party. (Id. at 4-6.)
We write respectfully and regrettably to correct a material mistaken statement of fact that the Government made to the Court and Plaintiffs. Specifically, this morning, counsel from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) informed the undersigned of the following: the memorandum entitled Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or Near Courthouses, dated May 27, 2025 – which the Government relied on in presenting its arguments in this case and referred to as the “2025 ICE Guidance” – does not and has never applied to civil immigration enforcement actions in or near Executive Office for Immigration Review (“EOIR”) immigration courts. Attached to this letter is an e-mail memorandum dated March 19, 2026 (which the undersigned attorneys also received for the first time today) that was sent to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations personnel as a “reminder that the May 27, 2025, Guidance does not apply to Executive Office for Immigration Review (Immigration) courts, regardless of their location.” See Ex. A (emphasis in original). In light of the fact that the 2025 ICE Guidance does not apply to immigration court arrests, the Government withdraws those portions of its briefs (ECF Nos. 39, 66, 70 and 74) and the statements made at the September 2, 2025 oral argument that relied on the 2025 ICE Guidance to correct the record before the Court.1 The Government recognizes that the Court’s September 12, 2025 opinion and order (ECF No. 51) and Plaintiffs’ briefs, all of which relied on the Government’s prior representations regarding the applicability of the 2025 ICE Guidance,
Molliver said if the family loses the appeal, they are expected to be deported to Ecuador, their country of origin.
Before wrapping up, the motions related to the Administrative Record demand attention. In an APA case, the Government must ordinarily “file a certified list of the contents of the administrative record with the Court within 30 days following service of the answer to the complaint or simultaneously with the filing of a dispositive motion, whichever occurs first.” See LCvR 7(n)(1). Both parties here look to modify this obligation. Nine days after initiating suit, Plaintiffs moved to expedite Administrative Record production. Mot. to Expedite, ECF No. 8-1. The Government opposed that request and asked the Court to stay its obligation to file a certified list of the Administrative Record contents. Mot. to Stay, ECF No. 16; see Standing Order at 5–6, ECF No. 4 (permitting an agency to request an exemption from Rule 7(n) if the agency believes the Administrative Record contents “would not be helpful” for resolving a motion to dismiss). Because the Court resolved the motion to dismiss without the Administrative Record contents, it grants the Government’s motion and denies Plaintiffs’ request. Because this case will progress, however, the Government now must turn over the Administrative Record. See generally LCvR 7(n)(1). The Court therefore orders the parties to confer and agree upon a proposed scheduling order to govern future proceedings.
Thursday’s short email to ICE lawyers does not give a reason for the pause, or say whether it’s temporary or permanent. The email also says lawyers do not need to withdraw motions that have already been filed.
Ecuador’s Foreign Minister announced that discussions center on an annual cap of 300 individuals per year. U.S. officials, by contrast, have emphasized that there is “no specific quota” in the agreement.
Date Filed: March 8th, 2026, 11:39 p.m. EDT Uploaded: March 9th, 2026, 12:45 a.m. EDT
The Board and Immigration Judges have no authority to use administrative closure as a de facto extra-statutory form of relief that effectively grants amnesty to thousands of removable aliens because they may be eligible for a visa sometime in the future.2
State response to motion to supplement the record in C.M. v Noem about unscheduled legal visitation of Alligator Alcatraz detainees https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71155779/238/cm-v-noem/ "2. The second declaration recounts the declarant’s e-mail discussions with Facility staff while trying to arrange a visit with her client. The declarant alleges that she asked Facility staff whether she could “visit a client at Alligator Alcatraz without scheduling the visit ahead of time,” and claims “I have received no confirmation” as to that question. See DE 235-2. But this evidence likewise offers the Court little of value, for at least two reasons. First, Facility staff answered her question. Indeed, staff responded by saying “Good afternoon, Yes, to schedule a visit or call, please submit the attached legal counsel visitation form and Form G28. Once we receive them, we will proceed with scheduling the visit/call.” Id. Put differently, staff confirmed that counsel can visit detainees without scheduling a visit and then added that to schedule such a visit, counsel must provide the requested information. Nowhere did staff claim that declarant could not visit the Facility unless she scheduled a visit in advance. Indeed, staff also clarified that it was asking the declarant to schedule a visit “so we can ensure the detainee is available for the visit without delay.” Id. It did not state that she could not visit without doing so, which is entirely in line with Mr. Saunders’ testimony that staff would not turn away attorneys that show up at the Facility and would accommodate them at the earliest available time. See DE 230 at 136:15-16; 178:15-16; 179:24-25.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "Look, let me just say right here: I am not for defending ICE. I am not for abolishing ICE. Some people might want me to take that position. ICE actually has some other responsibilities."
Former DeSantis Broward School Board appointee Torey Alston standing next to Ron DeSantis and Jared Moskowitz at a lectern with the state seal of Florida.
Partial map of the southern United States, showing the states covered by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals—Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi—in green against the rest of the map in various patterns of gray.
No masks on ICE agents so we can see who they are. Cameras on so that you can see and have documentation of an enforcement action. No dragnet operations. No busting into houses with no warrants. No dragging people out of their cars. They're doing that to American citizens. No racial profiling. Look, let me just say right here: I am not for defunding ICE. I'm not for abolishing ICE. Some people might want me to take that position. ICE actually has some other responsibilities, including doing, uh, forensic, forensic investigations to go after child sexual predators and folks who engage in, you know, in trafficking in child pornography, which are crime scene photos, not pornography and..but there have to be guardrails and accountability.
The deal would allow the United States to send foreign nationals to Argentina, thousands of miles south of Washington, with the idea that from there they would potentially be offered flights to return to their home countries.
Under the proposed agreement, Argentina would accept individuals who were detained near the border shortly after entering the U.S. illegally, said one of the people an official with the familiar Department of Homeland Security with the discussions.
01/26/2026 222 ENDORSED ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record at the January 26, 2026, Zoom motion hearing, 214 Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Subpoena on Juan Lopez Vega is GRANTED. Federal Defendants must produce Mr. Lopez Vega to provide testimony at the evidentiary hearing on January 28, 2026. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/26/2026. (SEJ) (Entered: 01/26/202
Meanwhile, Van Hollen reports they could not speak to any of the seven or eight detainees they saw inside. “There’s nothing in Maryland law that prohibits a member of congress from talking to a detainee. Clearly, they don’t want us talking to the people who are detained here today,” he said. Though not every question came with an answer on the spot, the lawmakers were informed that there had been more than 100 people held at the facility at once at some point, which had three holding rooms and two additional small rooms.
They handcuffed her and by late that evening she was transported to the US Immigration’s and Customs Enforcement Field Office in Baltimore, housed in the George H. Fallon Federal Building at 31 Hopkins Plaza. “I would sleep on the floor. There was a concrete structure that looked kind of like a stage, I would sleep there,” she said. She says her room had no window, she was never taken outside for fresh air or recreation. She was housed completely alone with no way to tell time. “When I was locked in there my mental health was bad,” she said. “There was a point where I was pulling my hair out. I was banging my head against the cement walls because I didn't understand. I didn't know why I was being locked up.” At first, she said she was given peanut butter and jelly sandwiches daily. But when she asked for something else, she said the guards stopped feeding her completely. She thinks she went between four and five days without food.
In preparation for the evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 28, 2026, and pursuant to Local Rule 3.04, Plaintiffs’ counsel provided written notice on January 13, 2026 to the Federal Defendants of their intent to call Mr. Lopez Vega as a witness at the hearing. See Declaration of Eunice Cho (“Cho Decl.”) ¶ 3 and Ex. A (Email Correspondence). In that same correspondence, Plaintiffs’ counsel asked whether counsel for the Federal Defendants would be willing to accept electronic service of the subpoena for Mr. Lopez Vega and, in addition, requested the address for Mr. Lopez Vega to otherwise facilitate service of the subpoena. See id. The Federal Defendants refused to accept electronic service of the subpoena and refused to provide the address at which Mr. Lopez Vega could be served. See id. ¶ 4 and Ex. A.
The Tribal Task Force Model serves as a force multiplier for tribal law enforcement agencies to enforce limited immigration authority with ICE oversight under Title 25 USC 2804.
Rather than shuttling detainees around the country to wherever detention space is available, as happens now, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement aims to speed up deportations by establishing a deliberate feeder system, the document says. Newly arrested detainees would be booked into processing sites for a few weeks before being funneled into one of seven large-scale warehouses holding 5,000 to 10,000 people each, where they would be staged for deportation.
ICE officials sought to block journalists from attending Vizguera’s bail hearing last week, an abrupt departure from what are typically open court proceedings. The warden of the detention center told reporters and one of Vizguerra’s lawyers that media and other observers were prohibited from watching because of the attention the case had received. (Officials eventually relented and allowed media into the courtroom.)
Report Date Days_FY26 FY26_ADP MANDAYS_FY26 Change_MANDAYS ADP between reports 11/28 58 1225 71050 12/11 71 1267 89957 18907 1454.384615
“Without timely access to their records, individuals face a severe information imbalance. Government attorneys and immigration prosecutors have full access to the A-File while the noncitizen and their counsel remain in the dark,” according to the disclosure. “The imbalance caused by FOIA compliance failures creates a substantial and specific threat to public safety as processing delays result in unjust deportations, prolonged detention and family separation.”
Noem and her close adviser Corey Lewandowski have sought to deflect blame from themselves for any White House frustration with the pace and scope of the deportations, pinning it instead on the leaders of the agencies in charge of immigration enforcement — acting ICE Director Todd Lyons and Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott, the DHS officials said. Underscoring the turmoil, Scott recently expressed concern to colleagues that Lewandowski is able to monitor his emails, the two officials and another DHS official said, sparking concern among other top staffers that their messages were being reviewed. “Everyone in leadership is so worried about what they say in email and text,” one of the top staffers said.
(1)In general Not later than 180 days after July 29, 2010, the Secretary shall establish procedures to enter into memoranda of agreement for the use (with or without reimbursement) of the personnel or facilities of a Federal, tribal, State, or other government agency to aid in the enforcement or carrying out in Indian country of a law of either the United States or an Indian tribe that has authorized the Secretary to enforce tribal laws. (2)Certain activities The Secretary may authorize a law enforcement officer of such an agency to perform any activity the Secretary may authorize under section 2803 of this title.
287 (g) Participating TTFM Agencies The data will be provided soon. 287(g) Pending TTFM Agencies The data will be provided soon.
Preliminary data indicates that many more cases have been pretermitted pursuant to the Honduras ACA than can be transferred to Honduras under the current agreement (in which Honduras committed to receive ten third country nationals per month).
https://bsky.app/profile/orlandosentinel.com/post/3m6yycsubu22j Orlando Sentinel ‪@orlandosentinel.com‬ Follow Florida state parks need $759 million in repairs, report finds trib.al/aJN5kBg [Underwater photo of shallow ecosystem] Florida state parks need $759 million in repairs, report finds The new state report, released Monday, details funding required over the next decade to bolster the quality of Florida’s 175 parks, the health of their ecosystems and the public’s ability to enjoy … trib.al Dec 2, 2025, 7:52 AM