David Ho @davidho.bsky.social · 1d

I have some thoughts: Marine CO₂ removal (mCDR) research and development should be carried out by governments, not by startups funded by VCs and philanthropy. These startups will either go belly up soon or sell themselves to a fossil fuel company for greenwashing. carbon-pulse.com/530652

61 likes 5 replies

?

Replies

Christine · 1d

Marine CO₂ removal should not be done al all.

Emmmmmma · 1d

Can’t they just support Kelp forest restoration?

CaptainDrawdown · 1d

The exit-risk point is real, but public R&D alone moves slowly. Middle path: government-run measurement and verification, plus rules barring credits that offset ongoing fossil emissions. Who verifies the numbers matters most.

maryemmaholly.bsky.social · 1d

1000% this - beside which, the scale, depth and precision of bioengineering needed is still beyond our means and conception. 🐦‍⬛⚫️🌱

Dan Browne · 1d

What if a company figures out how to make money doing mCDR? Profit is to a company as Gibbs free energy is to a chemical reaction. Negative free energy means a reaction is spontaneous. Profit means a company can grow and do more.