Esteban

@estebanbt.bsky.social

72 Followers 75 Following

PhD candidate in Cognitive Neuroscience at LMU | Currently researching respiration's impact in memory at SchreinerLab

Decision values increased after the SO-spindle complexes found in a later time window of the same antiphase trial
Both cues elicited memory reactivation but at different times from the coupled SO-spindle trough. Interestingly, this delay aligned the period of reactivation for antiphase cues to match the original one from preferred-phase (in-phase) cueing.
Following cue onset, preferred-phase cues show a higher (SO) Phase - (Spindle) Amplitude Coupling as compared to antiphase cueing. This difference is stronger in frontal channels.
Memory performance was enhanced for preferred-phase cues as compared to antiphase cues. Memory performance is calculated by dividing post- with pre-sleep performance (100% means no memory change).
a) Paradigm of the experiment d) Extracted preferred-phases from the adaptation nap (and their respecitve antiphase)
INHP = inhalation peak (i.e., inhalation-to-exhalation transition) EXHT = exhalation trough (i.e., exhalation-to-inhalation transition)
(Top) Time-frequency representation of remembered vs. not remembered trials locked to cue onset. (Bottom) Results from a timepoint-to-timepoint classification, showing memory reactivation after cue onset.