TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻

@maytree1.bsky.social

330 Followers 666 Following

🏳️‍🌈to piss off homophobes; 🇺🇦to piss off #Putinversteher​s. Uncommented retweets *are* endorsements; views my employer's (self-employed). Pronouns: I/me. Twitter aka 𝕏: https://x.com/maytree1

"Bundestagspräsidentin Julia Klöckner ist Opfer der aktuellen Phishing-Angriffswelle gegen Nutzer des Messengerdienstes Signal geworden. Das Signal-Konto der CDU-Politikerin wurde von den Angreifern erfolgreich kompromittiert, wie mehrere Quellen dem SPIEGEL bestätigen."
"The agent mentioned that Labour’s VAT on school fees has affected people’s ability to move up the property ladder. When they’ve got to find tens of thousands more to put their children through school, it means shelving plans to move."
"unpopular opinion" meme
"The way to make money from a scientific article looks very similar, except that scientific publishers manage to duck most of the actual costs. Scientists create work under their own direction – funded largely by governments – and give it to publishers for free; the publisher pays scientific editors who judge whether the work is worth publishing and check its grammar, but the bulk of the editorial burden – checking the scientific validity and evaluating the experiments, a process known as peer review – is done by working scientists on a volunteer basis. The publishers then sell the product back to government-funded institutional and university libraries, to be read by scientists – who, in a collective sense, created the product in the first place. It is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other’s work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill. Outside observers tend to fall into a sort of stunned disbelief when describing this setup. A 2004 parliamentary science and technology committee report on the industry drily observed that “in a traditional market suppliers are paid for the goods they provide”. A 2005 Deutsche Bank report referred to it as a “bizarre” “triple-pay” system, in which “the state funds most research, pays the salaries of most of those checking the quality of research, and then buys most of the published product”."
Diagram from the Financial Times showing a "democratic backsliding" for Trump's second term that is progressing faster than in the other countries mentioned in the post.
Screenshot of „Thru the Wall“
"The way to make money from a scientific article looks very similar, except that scientific publishers manage to duck most of the actual costs. Scientists create work under their own direction – funded largely by governments – and give it to publishers for free; the publisher pays scientific editors who judge whether the work is worth publishing and check its grammar, but the bulk of the editorial burden – checking the scientific validity and evaluating the experiments, a process known as peer review – is done by working scientists on a volunteer basis. The publishers then sell the product back to government-funded institutional and university libraries, to be read by scientists – who, in a collective sense, created the product in the first place. It is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other’s work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill. Outside observers tend to fall into a sort of stunned disbelief when describing this setup. A 2004 parliamentary science and technology committee report on the industry drily observed that “in a traditional market suppliers are paid for the goods they provide”. A 2005 Deutsche Bank report referred to it as a “bizarre” “triple-pay” system, in which “the state funds most research, pays the salaries of most of those checking the quality of research, and then buys most of the published product”."
An Accessibility Relation Based On The Point Of Conception To “whittle down” the set of possible worlds to deliver one that meets Heying’s intuition, we would need to define an accessibility relation that connects only possible worlds in which an individual can (possibly) produce only one gamete type. A seemingly reasonable way to approach this would be to define accessibility as being limited to the set of worlds in which an individual has the same genome, taking the existence of an individual to begin at the point of conception, and so considering only possible life histories post-conception.⁶ But this can’t work for Heying’s purposes either. Some individuals who don’t produce gametes simply won’t produce them in any such accessible possible world: no matter how many times you rewind a life history to an earlier point in life and “replay the tape”, you can only average out chance developmental fluctuations.
"Kim" Hipwell's profile picture on Medium
Screenshot of clarification by author Claire Ainsworth that she doesn't claim there are more than two sexes.
Screenshot von Werbung auf YouTube. Text: „Musk: „Soros hasst Menschheit“ Musk wird mittels X (ehemals Twitter) Soros NGOs verklagen Gesponsert Epoch Times Deutsch“
"Miriam Vollmer @miriam_vollmer Sie hätten als Erstklässler ihren schlagenden, spuckenden und stinkenden Zwangsnachbarn, der nicht lesen konnte, natürlich geliebt. 1:58 nachm. 30. Mai 2017 1 Deine Antwort posten Antworten Miriam Vollmer @miriam_vollmer • 30. Mai 2017 Ich bin bis heute davon überzeugt, dass es falsch ist, Kinder als Hilfslehrer für verhsltensgestörte Mitschüler einzusetzen."
"Felix, a Pat Sullivan Cartoon"
Tortendiagramm mit den Anteilen der Ergebnisse von inhaltlichen Schutzantragsprüfungen durch das BAMF im Jahr 2022. Asylanspruch 0,8%, Flüchtlingsstatus gem. GFK 17%, subsidiärer Schutz 25,2%, Abschiebeverbot 21,6%, Ablehnung 21,6%, formelle Entscheidung 22,3%. Quelle: https://www.nds-fluerat.org/themen/fakten/deutschland-asyl-in-zahlen-2022-2023/