Mark Cuban @mcuban.bsky.social · Jul 6

I did. often

1642 likes 69 replies

?

Replies

@floridianblue.bsky.social · Jul 6

I don’t know much about it but I would think eliminating the Electoral College, Citizens United and Term limits could turn this all around for democracy.

VintageLightandShadow · Jul 6

Spoiler candidates are awesome especially if successful at spoiling

Lex Wyatt · Jul 6

Try looking at the preferential voting system as used in Australia. It's a "ranked" system that works.

Crepuscular Canard · Jul 6

And even as a socialist and frequent critic, I thank you for that, however much or little effort was expended.

G

The Jason · Jul 6

Ranked choice

WAYancy · Jul 7

Ranked voting and abolish the senate in favor of a party based parliament

The One and Only Sean · Jul 7

You know whats also great, a parliamentary Democracy. but that aint happening either.

Daniel · Jul 6

Ranked choice voting is the most impactful thing we could do for democracy writ large. It allows every candidate a fair shake.

It’s Nelson! · Jul 6

The people’s choice win in NY and now the “establishment” is working hard to discredit him and to, potentially, change the system. It doesn’t allow for cornering voters as much as the current system.

@sargejnr.bsky.social · Jul 6

Why not first past the post? Genuine question as to me out seems the simplest and easiest way no?

@julzvc.bsky.social · Jul 6

Yup yup ranked choice voting!

AJ LoFranco · Jul 6

How about a constitutional right to hold politicians to accountability?

ColtsFanRick · Jul 6

That’s not modern day lobbying, modern day lobbying is where you pay our politicians to corruptly change the system to benefit somebody. This did literally nothing.

ZoZo · Jul 6

And abolish the electoral college.

Josh · Jul 6

Good. Keep pushing for it. Besides working on getting it on the ballot, fund educational programs, so voters can understand what RCV is.

@prodemocracysandy.bsky.social · Jul 6

Didn’t work in NYC. You have to have an open primary for ranked choice or the extremes play the system.

@bluehale.bsky.social · Jul 6

Ranked Choice Voting is great and I hope more places have it. Glad to see you vocally support it.

@vjax.bsky.social · Jul 6

With rank choice voting the man with the most money gets the most votes

Starry Fucking Bitch Nite · Jul 6

Try paper ballots, one per person, hand counted. The problem is the machines. Always has been

Bonnie Engle · Jul 6

I could see you doing what Elon is trying do do. Your cost plus drugs was good for the people and good business. He is too self serving in a way that is not good for this country. He would have never supported Trump if he were a decent human being. He is to self serving. He gutted our government.

@wrathofgus.bsky.social · Jul 7

Ranked choice but I’m in support of constitutional amendments for judges and all elected officials that they can’t accept any donations from any company or lobbies and only a small limit like $50 from constituents. Presidential election based on a national popular vote and no gerrymandering

M. Tomlinson · Jul 6

So does that mean the people running would be put on a list and the voters would rank them from 1 to whatever? Not sure how that would work. Wouldn't you still be voting for the party and not the person?

Monarchs be free · Jul 6

Isn’t that a clever way to play both sides? Agree with my vision or I will support a candidate to take votes from you,it can work both ways,clever,my opinion make civics education mandatory as early as possible and voting mandatory on all levels of elections especially if you get government funding

Sam T · Jul 7

Oooooooo yaaaaaas Mark Cuban is for RCV! We need it so bad. An even larger improvement for RCV would be to have a point system in RCV. In a 3-person race, 1st choice gets 2 points, 2nd gets 1 point, 3rd gets 0. Then there wouldn’t be the “center squeeze” effect that RCV gets criticized for.

Robert · Jul 6

Anyone saying “Ranked choice voting could loosen the death grip of the two dominant parties” I wholeheartedly agree (could stand to lose the electoral college while we’re at it). Anyone saying “the left should splinter without altering how we vote”, is either an idiot, or hates the left.

@corruption47.bsky.social · Jul 6

I prefer jungle primaries. Best two vote getters move forward to general.

Ross Comer · Jul 6

Once this is done, fix redistricting and end gerrymandering. There's a simple fix: www.cmu.edu/news/stories...

Reina · Jul 10

I think proportional representation voting is much better. 🤷‍♀️

Celeste D · Jul 6

I like the comparison to the market. Dominant monopolies/oligopolies lead to higher prices, lower wages, lower quality, less innovation. No reason not to consider whether bad side effects also affect political markets.

Steve · Jul 6

bottom of the barrel for so many, bsky.app/profile/loul...

SERTx18 · Jul 6

Mark you are refreshing to many people. Willing to listen and open minded. Often times we get siloed in echo chambers

@ovmkxz.bsky.social · Jul 6

Ranked Choice Voting is a big improvement, reduces but does not eliminate spoiler candidates because those who do not rank one of the final two are not excluded. Candidate Transferable Voting is less complicated for voters and also solves this. meezamuka.wordpress.com/2020/12/15/c...

Mary F. Kesson · Jul 6

Even if you don't like the concept for general elections, it's perfect for primaries. It takes a couple cycles, but people get it. "If you can make it there, you’ll make it anywhere!"

@pjd718.bsky.social · Jul 6

How about we make politicians and their donors subject to the same type of laws that exist in the securities industry, so that they can be held responsible for fraudulent statements made in connection with fundraising?

@jomomma1.bsky.social · Jul 6

How do we get rid of citizens united? Our voices our often overshadowed by corporate interest.

Betty Jane · Jul 6

No, we need informed citizens, its OUR COUNTRY.

The Social Farmer · Jul 6

It led to the Ladafication of politics. (See car)

@oriolesfan1.bsky.social · Jul 6

If we’re going to have a winner take all system, rank choice voting is so much better than nothing. It gives 3rd parties a much better chance since we don’t use vote proportions like they do in parliamentary systems.

Trobs · Jul 6

Mark. Stop giving the GOP any money. Stop pretending it's both sides. Capitalist hell

Mark Cassady · Jul 7

Great point comparing our current system to industry. The two parties have a monopoly and should be broken up.

Foolish Runner · Jul 6

Ranked choice voting would have a greater impact on democracy in the US than any other single item possible. The change in the manner of election remove the “winner takes all” politics, forces power sharing and stabilises a multi-party system.

@gardenia-38.bsky.social · Jul 6

Is this a thing now for billionaires to be the ones to decide how elections should be conducted? Or start a political party?

Ralph Houston · Jul 6

The media and their billionaire owners game every vote to make the result 50:50, making action impossible. However, the only time FPTP can be replaced is in exactly that situation, a hung administration. Voting reformers need to take note and advantage of this.

@bryceeberhart.bsky.social · Jul 6

And then do what we do here in Australia, make voting mandatory. When everyone votes it eliminates the most extreme actors on all sides.

TheGrey · Jul 7

RCV needs to be brought up in any discussion about the parties. Never stop.

Dillon Walker · Jul 6

Do you understand that those of us that have seen people with enormous money, power and an audience like Elon spending 250 million getting Donald elected and destroying government w/ DOGE, makes us uneasy when another billionaire like yourself is offering to throw in your support?

@fabiandlt.bsky.social · Jul 6

Interesting, I will be doing some research on ranked choice voting to understand this. Thanks for sharing.

@soccercoachlori.bsky.social · Jul 6

Rank choice then also addressing Gerrymandering will be huge tools to fight back extremism

ReadingWarrior · Jul 6

RCV reduces the incidence of spoilers, but it must be adopted state by state.

@yeoldemusic.bsky.social · Jul 6

There is a reason why many republicans are so adamantly against ranked choice voting.

Mike Bartley · Jul 6

Would ranked choice increase the number of parties in government? Isn't it still just First Past the Post?

Tektology Enjoyer · Jul 7

Might I interest you in Range Voting? It's got the granularity of Ranked Choice with the ease of Approval voting! Here's one neat implementation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAR_vo...

@asiog.bsky.social · Jul 6

I think getting rid of the electoral college would be beneficial. What do u think?

@overtobserver.bsky.social · Jul 6

Too late.

Geelan Mitchell Media · Jul 6

Try Australia's election system. The best in the world because we copied bits of the Westminster System (UK) and parts of Washington System, hence the term "Washminister" in Australia. 1. Mandatory voting for everyone over 18. 2. Preferential (ranked choice) voting and ...

MI Momma · Jul 6

Michigan is trying to get ranked choice voting on the ballot in 2026. Ballot proposal language recently approved and signature collection campaign about to begin soon. Will you help @rankmivote.bsky.social get the word out and promote ranked choice voting around Michigan?

@penguins18.bsky.social · Jul 6

Admire you taking a stance, but RCB does not increase the viability of 3rd parties. It does tend to help moderates in primaries in both parties, however, which is a good thing.

AcquariDan · Jul 6

Preferential voting and compulsory voting would solve many problems. You wouldn't be fighting voting purges because everyone has to vote. It won't happen because the GOP would never win an election again. We have more freedom knowing our vote counts and is counted oh and free healthcare for everyone

@dorindaroche.bsky.social · Jul 6

Why reduce everything to a business model. Although I think I agree that the two party system should be killed off, along with the electoral college, it's because I'm a coalition person. I like to get others expertise and opinions before making a deck especially if it's going to affect them.

Arthur Simon · Jul 6

Austin voters passed it a while back but Rick Perry's secretary of state Henry Cuellar killed it

@freethebird2025.bsky.social · Jul 6

The American Party, known as the Native American Party before 1855[a] and colloquially referred to as the Know Nothings, or the Know Nothing Party, was an Old Stock nativist political movement in the United States in the 1850s. Members of the movement were required to say "I know nothing"

Diogenes’ Flashlight · Jul 6

Please no. Ralph Nader tanked Gore. Jill Stein gave us Trump. Get a foolproof system with paper verification for voting, and make it easier for every eligible voter to cast their ballot. End gerrymandering and get misinformation labeled on all social media while restoring the fairness doctrine.

Just Oz · Jul 6

It's a start, but what odds is this thought or process going to have to go through for it to come to fruition/become reality.

AngryNap · Jul 6

Without a truth based media conglomerate to offset Fox we'll still have the same ignorant, reactionary populace.

Son Of Bolfa · Jul 6

Ranked choice is good. But just wanting it won’t be enough. Campaign money needs to be fully public and the country needs opened up to true plurality. Proportionality won’t necessarily fix representation. But ranked choice can actively drive more people to polls if they feel more represented.

@sl25.bsky.social · Jul 6

Funny it works so well in NYC. Just ask Zohran.