Oxfraud @oxfraud.com · Feb 20 2/3 Latest—the unoriginal idea of taking the annotations in books owns by Sir Henry Neville and relating them to the plays. Since the books belonged to Neville, and the handwriting bears obvious similarities to Neville's, Oxfordians have jumped to the conclusion that everyone is wrong, once again.
3 likes 1 replies
?
Replies
The opposite claim is made in the a dissertation which assumed all the annotations in De Vere's Bible to it's owner on the strength of a receipt despite differing signs of aging in the ink. His analysis, again, is a treat for students of irrational people. shake-speares-bible.com/2025/02/05/f...