Peter Teffer

@peterteffer.bsky.social

2476 Followers 303 Following

Investigative journalist for Follow the Money. Wrote books about Dieselgate, and EU lobbying. Favourite EU law: Regulation 1049/2001. Most hated EU law: Regulation 1049/2001.

Inadmissible defeat devices I inadmissible emission behaviour of the Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi 140kW EU6b and Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi 120kW EU6b (emission type approval e9*715/2007*2016/646Y*1372*00 and e9*715/2007*2016/646Y*1371)
"The insurance industry is strongly opposed to a ban on inducements, as such a policy measure will have consequences to their business models (including the fact that intermediaries would have to charge the clients for the services they provide, including advice). The industry is worried that many investors would not be willing to pay for advice (see defensive on advice gap)."
"While these measures include a partial ban for execution only services, it is clear that the impact on the conflict of interest in the advice scenario will be fairly limited. They will not constitute a real alternative to a full ban and will not be perceived as this by the consumer organisations."
Uitgever Jan-Willem Sanders heeft mij vandaag mijn certificaat uitgereikt voor het voltooien van de cursus Introduction to Battery Safety.
Oprichter Franke Hoekstra vertelde in 1985 in de Telegraaf over zijn motivatie: er gebeurden te veel ongelukken die met een keuring waren te voorkomen.
"Op basis van informele gesprekken met de EC blijkt dat een alternatief pakket niet opportuun is, omdat het onzeker is of het alternatieve pakket voldoende emissiereductie kan borgen en of alle onderdelen van een alternatief pakket tijdig, dat wil zeggen uiterlijk 31 augustus 2026, kunnen worden gerealiseerd en aangetoond. Gezien de complexiteit en looptijd van het wijzigingsproces, de onzekerheid over de uitkomst en de beperkte ruimte voor aanvullende beleidsvoorstellen, is de conclusie dat de betreffende mijlpalen niet tijdig kunnen worden vervangen."
De mijlpalen die Nederland beloofde aan Brussel in het coronaherstelplan (HVP).
Honourable Members, In some communities across Europe, traditional media are struggling. In many rural areas, the days of going out for a local paper is a nostalgic memory. This has created many news deserts where disinformation thrives. And this is very dangerous for our democracy. Because informed citizens who can trust what they read and hear are essential to keep those-in-power accountable. And when independent media are dismantled or neutralised, our ability to monitor corruption and preserve democracy is severely weakened. This is why the first step in an autocrat's playbook is always to capture independent media. Because this enables backsliding and corruption to happen in the dark. So we need to do more to protect our media and independent press. This is why we will launch a new Media Resilience Programme – it will support independent journalism and media literacy. But we also need to invest to address some of the root causes of this trend. This is why in the next budget, we have proposed to significantly boost funding for media. We also need to enable private equity. We will therefore use our tools to support independent and local media. A free press is the backbone of any democracy. And we will support Europe's press to remain free.
"Extensive experience of Mr. Klaus Welle in strategic oversight and planning, coalition building, political relations”