Mark Glasgow @phenotype.dev · Jun 5 1 / 2
Fairly restricted by characters here, the evidence I've provided is more than enough but here ya go. Unless the loss rate is 0 which seems unlikely, no matter what numbers you substitute it eventually hits 0 given enough time.
1 likes 2 replies
?
Replies
Also highly recommend posting this on X and Nostr. Should get as many eyes on it for review.
Really appreciate the hypothesis and code. 92 years til all lost. I'd recommend 4 and 5 be adjusted to allow for continual advances in technology. Three and 4 can likely shift to A.I. over time to help with some of that bottleneck, including A.I. spending BTC with other A.I.