The above reasons, and it being a 40yo workhorse, shows why a re-engined version of the 757, or a child design of it, is what the industry needed. And no, the 737 MAX 10 doesn’t compete either (arguably worse?).
15 likes 2 replies
?
The above reasons, and it being a 40yo workhorse, shows why a re-engined version of the 757, or a child design of it, is what the industry needed. And no, the 737 MAX 10 doesn’t compete either (arguably worse?).
15 likes 2 replies