If you were thinking “huh, wonder if they showed up at some voter’s house because there was some filler birthdate in the database, maybe something like super obvious from 126 years ago like, idk, 1/1/1900” than wow great guess spot on.
1449 likes 57 replies
Replies
Mike E · Jun 9
Nick Shirley is the epitome of the useful idiot.
@cranemonster.bsky.social · Jun 9
This is obviously stupid and without any evidence. But this is a dress rehearsal for the general election.
Scotch · Jun 9
"1/1/1900" is the default date in Excel when there is a value of "0" in the cell, but the cell is formatted to show a Date in "MM/DD/YYYY". It's super common and anyone who knows how to do data analysis in Excel knows exactly what this means. This kid is stupid, and a loser.
Charlie Fillenwarth · Jun 9
Man, there are just so many people born on 1/1/1900 who survived to this day. All of them 126.5 years old. That’s crazy!!!
@jakemadtown.bsky.social · Jun 10
Who is paying this lying clown? Time to expose it and file some libel suits against this dishonesty.
🍥bot · Jun 10
smh Doris you can just use 1/1/2000 now
California Tech Guy · Jun 9
Sadly, people take ns seriously.
Zero Drip · Jun 9
Not a fan of that
Paula · Jun 9
Also, like, she is eligible to vote and has voted.... Is he implying that 126 year olds shouldn't be allowed to vote? Or that they get more voting power than mere 65 year olds? Like, what is the fraud here. One person, one vote. Seems like it is working great!
Goth or Ostro-goth · Jun 10
The 60 Minutes segment on this in November's gonna be lit.
@drillbit57.bsky.social · Jun 10
Lol. Basic database process to fill in missing days.
MB · Jun 9
No one has ever accused Nick Shirley of being smart. 😂
2CentNuisance · Jun 9
This is the same twat that did the fake Minneapolis daycare bullshit that started the ICE presence. He needs a good thumping.
Kathy · Jun 9
Absolutely ridiculous!
@biggerinjapan.bsky.social · Jun 9
Pretty ridiculous that they investigate, find an old woman at that address with that name, and instead of drawing the obvious inference (this is a real person with a faulty birthdate), they scream fRaUddDDdD!!!
@cinematika.bsky.social · Jun 9
I mean, this seems like it could be defamation too!
@eilrach.bsky.social · Jun 10
Oh, does anybody know where this is? That dreadful Oathkeeper illegally posted some voter data online from his district and if this poor woman is in his district, she should join the suit against him.
@eilrach.bsky.social · Jun 10
Oh, is this in the district where the Oathkeeper illegally released voter data? If so, tell the election lawyers how the data is being misused. The sheriff needs a smack down.
@eilrach.bsky.social · Jun 10
This is the same guy who didn’t understand that people have actual mailboxes at UPS. So having a bunch of people registered to that address wasn’t fraud.
@eilrach.bsky.social · Jun 10
Yeah, the entire Grok debacle was because the children Musk hired didn’t know the first thing about databases. Or analyzing contracts. And they are continuing to promulgate lies that all have the same root cause, being too fucking stupid to do their jobs.
Chuck Fristmas · Jun 9
Look, say what you want about Nick, but his fellatio skills are the best I've ever encountered.
Matt Siegel · Jun 9
shirley mistaken
Champion of the Anchorage · Jun 9
So what did Nick conclude here? If all the info is correct except her birthdate, Is This A Fraud?
D. · Jun 9
I remember doge boys doing the same claims of 150 yo people in social security, explainable by the same database unknown = very_old_date
Madame Beloved Dictator · Jun 9
Some computer programs did that at one time—reset dates to 1900. I’m not sure exactly why, but I remember it causing problems with some of my files. But they would rather it be something that fits their “fraud” claims.
The Beautiful Midnight · Jun 9
Nick Shirley is medically stupid.
@furtherexchange.bsky.social · Jun 10
They are So. Fucking. Stupid. (And, sadly, dangerous)
Blobert v3.0 · Jun 9
Meet Nick, he’s a scarcely educated twat with nothing better to do than invent crises for his uneducated followers to froth at the mouth about.
Chelle ✊🌻 *fElon hacked the election* · Jun 9
I am so tired of that little punk bitch.
Lynette MacLeod · Jun 9
Everything's a conspiracy when you don't know how anything works
@meekman.bsky.social · Jun 9
These dipshits have discovered a new gig that'll make them popular and make money. They comb through government data and look for what they think is fraud even though they are too dumb to understand what they're seeing. Multiple influencers on the right are now doing it.
@lucidbla.bsky.social · Jun 10
Unless she voted, it's not an issue My town has me registered in 2 locations with 3 different names but I only vote once. I have spoken to them about it and they said it's fine because if I voted more than once I'd have a problem. Most people don't do election fraud, it's bullshit.
Ricky Weina · Jun 9
Is the fraud that she 'claims' to be 126 years old? Is there some other claim here? Voted in 51 elections and it didn't come up that her birthdate was an error?
@nicholask24.bsky.social · Jun 9
So desperate to find any shred of evidence to bolster their unproven nonsense.
Tom (kid codger) O'Neill · Jun 9
"This one pinto bean is a distinctly different color than the other beans in this bag of Goya pinto beans. Yet Goya allows it to be sold as a pinto bean. #fraud"
HeadhunterSully · Jun 9
CA, send him!
@annabellelecter.bsky.social · Jun 9
No wonder Ben Shapiro couldn't keep up.
Snarky McSnarkerson · Jun 9
Social media will be the downfall of the world. There should be an exam given before people are allowed access to the internet.
Eric Lippert · Jun 9
Possible culprit: in Microsoft Excel a zero in a cell marked as being a date is treated as midnight 30 December 1899. Why midnight on Dec 30th rather than Dec 31st or Jan 1st? To work around a bug in Lotus. See ericlippert.com/2003/09/16/e... for details.
js · Jun 9
With these guys the question is always: absolute moron? Or, grifter that knows it is dumbshit? Both is often the answer I guess.
Dean Gullberry · Jun 9
But see, that's exactly why you WOULD choose 1/1/1900, get it? It's like reverse psyopology or whatever
RIP America 🇨🇦 · Jun 9
They need to bring their allegations into a court of law. The court of public opinion means nada.
Russ Walker · Jun 9
The woman who runs Audit the Vote PA posts these all the time, snarkily wishing someone a 115th birthday or whatever ... and it's maddening that people eat it up
Ryan J. Reilly “paints a vivid and urgent portrait of… disarray” · Jun 9
No way out of this without basic media literacy.
@candiceyyz.bsky.social · Jun 9
Just the dumbest. 🙄
JARED GOFF · Jun 10
I exported a report just last week that had a bunch of 1/1/1900 in it. Did I think a bunch of old people born on the exact same day enjoy sports betting? You bet your ass I did, because, like Nick, I’m a moron with no ability to use critical thinking. Or thinking in general.
🌮S. Quentin Quale · Jun 9
Nick is fucking stupid.
Et Tu Brutus · Jun 10
If true, she’s the oldest woman in the world
PBWisco · Jun 9
I don't understand his problem. She's a person with the wrong birthdate in the system. Why can't she vote. He's an idiot.
Dolorosa Santos · Jun 11
Dick Shirley.....
wirthling · Jun 9
getting a person's birthday wrong, despite it never interrupting this woman's ability to successfully legally vote 51 times, is a horrific perversion of justice and it gives me no comfort to suggest capital punishment seems appropriate and likely
Jude Nagurney Camwell (Iddybud) · Jun 9
Doris should sue his ass and make him explain to a judge, under oath, why he has chosen to harass her and publicly accuse her of fraud.
Kissel · Jun 9
Conservatives don’t require evidence for most things they believe.
R. Wellian · Jun 9
Nick Shirley is the new James O'Keefe. They both deserve to have their ears pushed together.