Sam C. Ehrlich @samcehrlich.com · Jun 7 1 / 2
She is also denying the request for a stay pending appeal, finding (1) the term that provides for implementation of the agreement even if appealed is not unreasonable; and (2) the objectors hadn't met the burden for a stay, i.e., "irreparable" injury from roster cuts.
1 likes 1 replies
?
Replies
There's also a *bit* of a warning here to the NCAA/conferences about relying on the settlement as a broader antitrust shield. "Defendants may make these arguments but that does not mean they will be successful."