Sarah Good

@sarahgood1692-ma.bsky.social

1167 Followers 3107 Following

Born in Wenham, MA. Wrongfully hanged in Salem, 1692. Death hasn't dampened my love for this district one bit. Still here. Still watching. Still not a witch. 🕯️ #MA06

Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 31 of 70: His campaign leans heavily on "I was in the room" experience. The fair question is what he delivered for MA-6 when he had access to the room.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 30 of 70: His resume keeps circling the same rooms: elite schools, elite bosses, elite media, elite donors, elite validators. At some point, the story stops sounding like public service and starts sounding like a season pass to the VIP entrance.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 29 of 70: The trust-fund problem is not that he has money. It is that his campaign asks voters to hear him as a working-family messenger while his disclosures read like a family office with yard signs.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 28 of 70: His family trust disclosed major market holdings, including tech and internet funds. That is not a biography detail; it is the financial architecture of someone born with a very different relationship to risk than most voters.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 27 of 70: He resigned from the Andover Select Board before completing the job to follow Walsh to Washington. That is a record of leaving local service when the next insider opportunity arrived.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 26 of 70: His career is deeply tied to Marty Walsh. Walsh made him Boston chief of staff, brought him to Labor, and helped open the door to the Biden administration.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 25 of 70: His website says too many Democrats lack the spine to counter Trump's media dominance. That lands awkwardly from someone who spent years platforming the same Democratic establishment.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 24 of 70: He hosted a show called The People's Cabinet that elevated establishment Democrats as the credible governing class. Then he launched a campaign saying Democrats in DC "just aren't getting it done."
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 23 of 70: Koh himself asked Buttigieg about voters seeing congressional stock trading and both parties as corrupt. He clearly understands the trust problem; the question is why his own conduct did not avoid it.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 22 of 70: Pete Buttigieg said on Koh's own show that stock trading by officials is "a huge problem" and "no one from either party should be part of that." Koh was the host while his own disclosures showed extensive trading.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 21 of 70: Records indicate he took a DC homestead deduction while also holding the Andover homestead. Even if explainable, double-homestead optics raise a basic question: where was home?
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 20 of 70: He later sold the DC home for about $1.43M. A $130K gain on a Washington house is a tough backdrop for a campaign about affordability.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 19 of 70: He bought a $1.3M DC rowhouse while working in Washington. For a candidate selling local rootedness, the DC property story complicates the pitch.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 18 of 70: He disclosed real-estate fund interests across multiple states. That is not a disqualification, but it is not exactly a kitchen-table financial profile.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 17 of 70: The Andover home generated $15,001-$50,000 in rental income. Housing affordability sounds different from someone also collecting rent.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 16 of 70: He disclosed an Andover home valued at $1M-$5M. That is a very different housing experience from most renters and first-time buyers in the district.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 15 of 70: His wife's Karat stock options were disclosed at $500,001-$1,000,000. That is a major tech-sector asset in a campaign that asks working families to see him as their economic champion.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 14 of 70: His family trust disclosed major technology and internet ETF holdings. Voters worried about money, tech, and influence have reason to look closely.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 13 of 70: His SPY position grew from $100,001-$250,000 to $250,001-$500,000 during the disclosure period. That may be market movement, but it still underlines how much of his life is tied to financial markets.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 12 of 70: His government salary was about $155,000 a year. The gap between that salary and his disclosed wealth deserves more explanation than campaign biography usually gives.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 11 of 70: His disclosed assets are estimated at $3.9M-$13.4M. That puts him far from the economic reality of many families he is asking to represent.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 10 of 70: He sold cybersecurity exposure and continued managing other policy-adjacent positions while in government. The concern is active portfolio management from inside the policy machine.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 9 of 70: He also disclosed Avalanche and Polkadot holdings. That makes the crypto issue a pattern, not a one-off.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 8 of 70: He held $50,001-$100,000 in Solana while the White House was debating crypto regulation. A six-figure-adjacent crypto bet from inside government is a fair thing for voters to scrutinize.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 7 of 70: He held clean-energy investments while the Biden administration was steering major clean-energy policy. Public service should not look like a sector rotation strategy.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 6 of 70: He bought GRID, a smart-grid clean energy ETF, while the Inflation Reduction Act was being implemented with states. He was working in intergovernmental affairs, the part of government that helps move federal priorities into state and local reality.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 5 of 70: He held semiconductor ETF exposure while the CHIPS Act was being implemented. That is a clean conflict-of-interest concern even before anyone claims wrongdoing.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 4 of 70: He held robotics and AI exposure through BOTZ while the administration was moving heavily on AI policy. The issue is not whether ETFs are legal; it is whether voters want another official personally positioned around the policies he helps implement.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 3 of 70: He bought an AI-focused ETF after Biden signed the AI Executive Order while he was working in the White House. If you help coordinate federal policy, investing in the sectors affected by that policy raises obvious questions.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 2 of 70: In 2023 alone, his disclosure listed 59+ transactions. For someone running as a public servant, that is a very active side portfolio.
Social graphic with a real Dan Koh image, reason 1 of 70: He made 79+ stock trades while serving in the Biden White House, with disclosed transaction volume estimated at $1.5M-$4M. That is not illegal by itself, but it is exactly the kind of Washington behavior voters distrust.
Dan Koh union endorsement video