simine vazire @simine.com · Dec 11

Here’s a short explanation of the peer review workflow coming to Psych Science, and the role of the handling editors (EiC, Senior, & Associate editors) vs STAR editors: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/psychological_science/contributor-faq-24

49 likes 3 replies

?

Replies

mark brandt · Dec 11

🤞that this works well. Seems sensible and so I really hope this works as a proof of concept other psych journals will follow.

Nils Petras · Dec 12

This looks nice, but over-engineering a system that already runs on unpaid labor (esp. by reviewers) sounds like starting at the wrong end of the problem to me and might be bound to create even more problems. What do you think?

Jay Patel · Dec 12

Any use of automation/AI for the transparency checks? Could be feasible for the light stage.