mr. TIM @timkellogg.me · 27d

xAI is suing a user for generating illegal CSAM content (consider not clicking the link, it’s pretty gross stuff) question: does fault lie solely on users? labs? or a mix? if this escalates to the supreme court we could have a landmark case arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...

21 likes 7 replies

?

Replies

Pekka Lund · 27d

User specifies what should be made and distributes results. Same if I ask it to generate some harmful story about you and spread it, right? Does anything change if I ask it to be generate it about a fictive person and change your name in the results before publishing it?

DJ · 27d

Guns don’t kill people … rappers do.

Jms Dnns · 27d

Generating content makes xAI a publisher, not a platform, so Elon will learn a hard lesson on that one

🦆 · 26d

Off the cuff I'd say it's both. The user should bear more of the responsibility; but the company should take reasonable steps to prevent abuse of its services. There are a lot of problems though, and hard cases make bad law.

John Gordon (Faughnan) 🇨🇦🇩🇰 · 27d

One of several landmark cases pending

💀👺 骨头先生 👹🦴(My friends call me "Kino") · 27d

This is 100% the user’s fault & AI should not be guard-railed & hobbled to prevent misuse. The AI is not liable for misuse. The user is. If I use a Mac to commit a crime online is Apple to blame? Should MacOS be hobbled & guard-railed to thwart people from committing crimes with Apple computers?

Sandro · 27d

Musk is looking for SCOTUS to grant him the same immunity gun manufacturers have.