Believe it or not, it was once GOP orthodoxy that the government shouldn't boost specific companies or industries and that Obama in particularly was somehow tangentially corrupt about doing so.
941 likes 22 replies
Replies
Jody Seaborn 🇺🇸 · 16d
Again and always with MAGA: Every grievance is a projection, every accusation a confession.
LL · 16d
I hate that we are ALL being dragged down to the portals of hell because 30% of voters cannot or will not accept that the party they identify with is a criminal syndicate- i hope that party and all who cling to it suffer as much as they are making the rest of us suffer with their stupidity and grift
OPSECtarian · 16d
“Picking winners and losers,” they used to call it.
@peyre.bsky.social · 16d
They're only ever upset about misdeeds by Democrats. When it's one of their own, doing much worse than anything a Democratic president's ever done, then they'll twist themselves into knots to justify it.
Donny · 16d
The government shouldn’t pick winners and losers. The electorate, on the other hand, keeps picking losers.
Charlie Mas · 16d
It isn't just "bad form" or frowned upon. It's an ethical violation and misuse of public office for a government official, acting in their official capacity to endorse or promote a commercial product or service.
Greg Motter · 16d
The media narrative has to be that the Republican base has no moral and intellectual core and will go wherever the propaganda leads them.
LCpl Pinky Herman, USMC · 16d
Kinda like how it was a mortal sin for Biden's son to serve on the board of an energy company, yet Uday and Qusay Trump having a stake in a mining company in Kazakhstan while their daddy is setting up an extraction deal for it is totally on the level.
Mike H · 16d
& little Philip said to father; "Wasn't there an olden time where thee GOP orthodoxy that the government shouldn't be a boostin' specific companies?" Father replied; "Ah there twas indeed. But twas backin thee early 2010s. Those days are but a memory son. Now, let's see how our Trump meme is doing"
Teenagemutantninjatoenail · 16d
It was always performative.
Mr Blifil · 16d
They’ve never given a shit about logical inconsistency just like they don’t give a shit about whether Trump DOJ prevails in court (they never will, it’s all just lawfare harrassment). Power exists to abuse it. Full stop.
johnfoleybeast · 16d
They never meant any of it.
@sonofsnorlax.bsky.social · 16d
OMG Solyndra-gate. Simpler times.
Cycle Fun Montreal · 16d
iirc the entire idea of industrial policy was considered something the USSRs 5-year plan did and something the USA didn't do. (In public, at least.)
Lindsey Graham Retirement Party · 16d
This is why "fuck you" is an acceptable response to any Republican "argument" they use to justify anything. Because we know everything they say is in bad faith.
Resistance is persistence! · 16d
#30million8/30 Patriot - devoted to one's country. Loyalist - devoted to a fucked up authoritarian. Don demands loyalty. As it was in 1776, it is now clear that patriots must defeat loyalist. 30 million street march August 30th. Make your voices heard all over the world.
John Doyle · 16d
Invisible hand or something
Tom Wrongbottom · 16d
"No picking winners and losers"
Lester Diamond · 16d
A functioning, coherent opposition would be able to effectively message rank hypocrisy and yet…
Annie · 16d
Pet peeve, if the investment by the Obama Admin had instead been made by VC's, the 94% success rate (what I remember) would have been seen as amazing, instead it was this one company didn't succeed so it must all be corrupt.
a doofus · 16d
What did republicans used to think about nationalizing big publicly-traded companies?