Quite Interesting @qi.com · Jul 18 The Initial Teaching Alphabet was a phonetic alphabet taught in some British schools in the 1960s. It was supposed to teach children to read faster. Instead, it created a generation of children who were unable to spell. (📷: Philip Howard)
123 likes 15 replies
Replies
Some of that looks just like txt or "twit" speech that's used today! 🤣
Should they of known? But’ve course!
Invented by James Pitman, the grandson of Isaac Pitman of shorthand fame.
That's fucked up.
Funnily enough @theguardian.com ran an article on this recently. I'm the right age to have been taught it, but it seems it didn't make it to Ireland. Thankfully.
This explains why there's a bunch of Boomers who will loudly defend their right not to be able to spell properly.
I vaguely remember it at school, early/mid 70s I guess. But I don't remember actually using it or being taught it.
It was used in the 70s, too. I had to endure it, despite having already learned to read, at home. My constant inability, to recognise the ‘letters’, in this abomination, led to me being considered a fool. Years later, they started using actual, fucking English. I caught up but the damage was done.
Yep - that was me
The original spelling of "donkey" was "donnie". They are miniature ("-ie") African "don" ("take away" from the farm) horses. "Don" is from whence we get the English "do" and "done".
That’s my egskews.
We got a phonics based program (Lippencott) in the US during the 60s that managed to teach us to read with the standard alphabet and spelling. Go figure.
Ouch
The US had "Hooked on Phonics", which helped kids read, but not to write.
I remember seeing an article about this the other day, suggesting that it's difficult to read anything in the ITA. It's really obvious what it's saying. Why did learning in this make bad spellers when we know people can quickly learn to spell in things like l337? It's really interesting!