Cabel Sasser @cabel.panic.com · 23d it's an historic redesign caught in the wild: newton's sheds the last of its late-90's vibes and joins the funky font family. it looks much better, right? agree or disagree? #wildredesign
57 likes 16 replies
Replies
Definitely looks nicer. Easy to find on the shelf as well. I would quibble with the weight of the “N” a bit as it looks a tad light compared to the other characters.
Better, but they're dead to me until they bring back the good flavors.
I don't hate it. Personally, however, I think that if they're not gonna bring back making other fruits into Newtons, they should just put Fig back in the mainline brand.
Way cleaner and more legible. The 'fig' part is the least important piece of information.
Cabel what’s up with the discrepancies between the fiber and sodium amounts. This feels like a conspiracy
Chobani.
Interesting how they've really downplayed the "fig" part of the packaging, but simultaneously insist it's "real fig." Now I'm trying to think if I've ever had fake fig.
1 serving is 3 “😦” (and i can’t unsee it)
Have they made a Newton with a better fruit inside yet?
(also interesting that they bumped serving size from 2 to 3 cookies, blowing past the coveted 100 calories. i feel like 6 cookies is maybe more accurate tho)
I have a question… What did the original packaging mean with that green leaf. What part of a fig newton uses a leaf
flabbergasted that they called them "cookies" on the old packaging (twice!). digging the little newton icon on the new one
Agree. It’s plump, like the product. The wispy font wast not very tasty.
she’s beautiful
Timtamd Coffee Suckerpunch
I like that they are trying to educate people on what a fig is using pictures of cut figs.